Listening to Jonas on Thursday this week was very controversial for me. I enjoyed his art aesthetically and conceptually. It made sense to me that he had an obsession with creating space and recreating space to fit his needs which I really enjoyed and understood. When it came to questions though, it seemed that articulating what he felt through words was not what I was getting through his images. I cannot tell if his art was lying to us or if he was and that was frustrating to me that he would not let himself be vulnerable in a simple college lecture. Also as a side note, I hope for my own health that if I ever became a rich and famous painter (I am not betting on it) that I will not make art just because the guy that gives me money tells me so. It's his art and he should own it. (although I guess I'm not the rich and famous one so what can I say.)